Ejemplo ficticio. La licitación, la empresa y el borrador son inventados para mostrar cómo es una revisión.
Revisión del borrador de oferta
Managed IT Service Desk 2027 to 2030 (fictional)
Westmoor District Council (fictional) · 2 nov 2026
Comparado con: Northgate IT Services (fictional)
Resumen
- Crítico
- 3
- Alto
- 5
- Mejora
- 0
- Por comprobar
- 0
5 de 6 preguntas relacionadas con una respuesta. 471 palabras revisadas.
Lista de correcciones, ordenada por la puntuación en juego
- 1.Crítico
Cyber Essentials Plus expires before the contract starts
En juego: 15%Your Cyber Essentials Plus certificate in the evidence file expires on 2026-12-01, before the expected contract start (2027-04-01).
Licitación: Invitation to tender (fictional), página 2“Suppliers must hold Cyber Essentials Plus for the whole contract. Describe your security controls.”
Su borrador: Question 2 Information security, párrafo 1“We hold Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 certification across our service.”
Corrección: Renew Cyber Essentials Plus, or state the renewal date in your answer with evidence that it is booked.
- 2.Crítico
Question 3 is over its word limit
En juego: 10%The limit is 300 words. Your answer is 346 words, 46 over. The tender says text over the limit is not read or may be disqualified.
Licitación: Invitation to tender (fictional), página 2“Question 3 Mobilisation”
Su borrador: Question 3 Mobilisation, párrafo 1“We will mobilise in three phases over eight weeks. Phase one covers discovery: we meet the incumbent, collect the asset register and copy the knowledge base into our system. Phase two runs the two service desks side by s”
Corrección: Cut the answer to 300 words or fewer. Keep the parts that respond directly to the question.
- 3.Crítico
Professional indemnity insurance figure does not match your evidence
Your answer states £5,000,000 cover. The policy in your evidence file shows £2,000,000.
Licitación: Invitation to tender (fictional), página 3“Pass/fail. Confirm you hold professional indemnity insurance of at least £2 million.”
Su borrador: Question 5 Insurance, párrafo 1“We hold professional indemnity insurance of £5 million with a leading insurer.”
Corrección: Correct the figure in the answer, or raise the cover and update the evidence file before you submit.
- 4.Alto
Question 1 may not cover one of its parts
En juego: 20%The question asks you to address: "monthly performance reporting to the council". We found little of this in your answer (key words: performance, reporting, monthly, council).
Licitación: Invitation to tender (fictional), página 2“monthly performance reporting to the council”
Su borrador: Question 1 Service delivery, párrafo 1“Our service desk logs every call in our ticketing system and prioritises it against the council's four priority levels. Priority 1 incidents are answered within 15 minutes and resolved within 4 hours.”
Corrección: Add a short paragraph that answers this part directly, using the buyer's own words so the evaluator can find it.
- 5.Alto
ISO 27001 is claimed but not in your evidence file
En juego: 15%Your answer says you hold ISO 27001. There is no confirmed ISO 27001 certificate in the evidence file this review used.
Licitación: Invitation to tender (fictional), página 2“Question 2 Information security”
Su borrador: Question 2 Information security, párrafo 1“We hold Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 certification across our service.”
Corrección: Add the ISO 27001 certificate (with its expiry date) to your evidence file, or remove the claim if it is not current.
- 6.Alto
Question 4 relies on general assurances
En juego: 10%The answer uses phrases such as "we are committed to", "we will ensure", "high-quality" but gives no figures, examples or measurable commitments.
Licitación: Invitation to tender (fictional), página 3“Question 4 Social value”
Su borrador: Question 4 Social value, párrafo 1“We are committed to the local community and we will ensure high-quality opportunities for local people.”
Corrección: Back each claim with a number, a named example or a commitment the buyer can measure (for example a response time or a past result).
- 7.Alto
Social value answer to question 4 has no measurable commitment
En juego: 10%The question is about social value. Your answer has no numbers, targets or dates the buyer can hold you to.
Licitación: Invitation to tender (fictional), página 3“Question 4 Social value”
Su borrador: Question 4 Social value, párrafo 1“We are committed to the local community and we will ensure high-quality opportunities for local people. We pride ourselves on best practice in everything we do and we are fully committed to the district.”
Corrección: State specific commitments: how many, by when and how you will report them (for example apprenticeships, local spend or volunteering hours).
- 8.Alto
No answer found for question 6
En juego: 5%The tender asks question 6 (5% weighting). We could not find an answer to it in your draft.
Licitación: Invitation to tender (fictional), página 3“Question 6 Exit plan”
Corrección: Add an answer headed "6" that responds to: Exit plan
Pregunta por pregunta
| Pregunta | Ponderación | Límite | Palabras | Estado | Hallazgos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Service delivery | 20% | 500 words | 55 | Falta una parte | 1 |
| 2 Information security | 15% | 400 words | 24 | Respondida | 2 |
| 3 Mobilisation | 10% | 300 words | 346 | Supera el límite | 1 |
| 4 Social value | 10% | 300 words | 34 | Respondida | 2 |
| 5 Insurance | Pass/fail | - | 12 | Apto/no apto | 1 |
| 6 Exit plan | 5% | 250 words | - | Sin respuesta | 1 |
Huecos en las pruebas
- Cyber Essentials Plus expires before the contract startsRenew Cyber Essentials Plus, or state the renewal date in your answer with evidence that it is booked.
- Professional indemnity insurance figure does not match your evidenceCorrect the figure in the answer, or raise the cover and update the evidence file before you submit.
- ISO 27001 is claimed but not in your evidence fileAdd the ISO 27001 certificate (with its expiry date) to your evidence file, or remove the claim if it is not current.
Fechas clave de la licitación
- Clarification questions close
- 12 January 2027
- Submission deadline
- 26 January 2027
- Expected contract start
- 1 April 2027
Cómo se hizo su revisión
Documentos de la licitación leídos: Invitation to tender (fictional) (3 páginas)
Archivos del borrador leídos: Northgate draft response (fictional).docx
- Every scored question, its weighting and its limit, read from the tender
- Each answer matched to its question
- Word and page limits counted
- Each part of multi-part questions looked for
- Certificate, insurance and turnover claims compared with your evidence file
- General assurances without figures or examples
- Social value commitments
Segunda comprobación: 8 confirmados, 0 rebajados, 0 descartados.
Limitaciones
- This review is feedback on your draft. It does not predict or promise a score, a shortlist place or a contract award.
- It reads the tender documents and draft you gave us. Documents we could not read, and any clarifications the buyer has published since, are not covered.
- You remain responsible for the accuracy of your bid and for submitting it through the buyer's own process.
- Quotes from the tender and your draft are shown as written. Our findings are in English.