架空の見本です。案件、会社、ドラフトはレビューの例を示すために作ったものです。
入札書類ドラフトのレビュー
Managed IT Service Desk 2027 to 2030 (fictional)
Westmoor District Council (fictional) · 2026年11月2日
照合先: Northgate IT Services (fictional)
概要
- 重大
- 3
- 高
- 5
- 改善
- 0
- 要確認
- 0
6件中5件の設問に回答を対応付けました. 471語をレビュー.
修正リスト（配点の大きい順）
- 1.重大
Cyber Essentials Plus expires before the contract starts
配点: 15%Your Cyber Essentials Plus certificate in the evidence file expires on 2026-12-01, before the expected contract start (2027-04-01).
案件: Invitation to tender (fictional)、2ページ“Suppliers must hold Cyber Essentials Plus for the whole contract. Describe your security controls.”
あなたのドラフト: Question 2 Information security, 第1段落“We hold Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 certification across our service.”
修正: Renew Cyber Essentials Plus, or state the renewal date in your answer with evidence that it is booked.
- 2.重大
Question 3 is over its word limit
配点: 10%The limit is 300 words. Your answer is 346 words, 46 over. The tender says text over the limit is not read or may be disqualified.
案件: Invitation to tender (fictional)、2ページ“Question 3 Mobilisation”
あなたのドラフト: Question 3 Mobilisation, 第1段落“We will mobilise in three phases over eight weeks. Phase one covers discovery: we meet the incumbent, collect the asset register and copy the knowledge base into our system. Phase two runs the two service desks side by s”
修正: Cut the answer to 300 words or fewer. Keep the parts that respond directly to the question.
- 3.重大
Professional indemnity insurance figure does not match your evidence
Your answer states £5,000,000 cover. The policy in your evidence file shows £2,000,000.
案件: Invitation to tender (fictional)、3ページ“Pass/fail. Confirm you hold professional indemnity insurance of at least £2 million.”
あなたのドラフト: Question 5 Insurance, 第1段落“We hold professional indemnity insurance of £5 million with a leading insurer.”
修正: Correct the figure in the answer, or raise the cover and update the evidence file before you submit.
- 4.高
Question 1 may not cover one of its parts
配点: 20%The question asks you to address: "monthly performance reporting to the council". We found little of this in your answer (key words: performance, reporting, monthly, council).
案件: Invitation to tender (fictional)、2ページ“monthly performance reporting to the council”
あなたのドラフト: Question 1 Service delivery, 第1段落“Our service desk logs every call in our ticketing system and prioritises it against the council's four priority levels. Priority 1 incidents are answered within 15 minutes and resolved within 4 hours.”
修正: Add a short paragraph that answers this part directly, using the buyer's own words so the evaluator can find it.
- 5.高
ISO 27001 is claimed but not in your evidence file
配点: 15%Your answer says you hold ISO 27001. There is no confirmed ISO 27001 certificate in the evidence file this review used.
案件: Invitation to tender (fictional)、2ページ“Question 2 Information security”
あなたのドラフト: Question 2 Information security, 第1段落“We hold Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 certification across our service.”
修正: Add the ISO 27001 certificate (with its expiry date) to your evidence file, or remove the claim if it is not current.
- 6.高
Question 4 relies on general assurances
配点: 10%The answer uses phrases such as "we are committed to", "we will ensure", "high-quality" but gives no figures, examples or measurable commitments.
案件: Invitation to tender (fictional)、3ページ“Question 4 Social value”
あなたのドラフト: Question 4 Social value, 第1段落“We are committed to the local community and we will ensure high-quality opportunities for local people.”
修正: Back each claim with a number, a named example or a commitment the buyer can measure (for example a response time or a past result).
- 7.高
Social value answer to question 4 has no measurable commitment
配点: 10%The question is about social value. Your answer has no numbers, targets or dates the buyer can hold you to.
案件: Invitation to tender (fictional)、3ページ“Question 4 Social value”
あなたのドラフト: Question 4 Social value, 第1段落“We are committed to the local community and we will ensure high-quality opportunities for local people. We pride ourselves on best practice in everything we do and we are fully committed to the district.”
修正: State specific commitments: how many, by when and how you will report them (for example apprenticeships, local spend or volunteering hours).
- 8.高
No answer found for question 6
配点: 5%The tender asks question 6 (5% weighting). We could not find an answer to it in your draft.
案件: Invitation to tender (fictional)、3ページ“Question 6 Exit plan”
修正: Add an answer headed "6" that responds to: Exit plan
設問ごとの結果
| 設問 | 配点 | 制限 | 語数 | 状態 | 指摘 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Service delivery | 20% | 500 words | 55 | 一部不足 | 1 |
| 2 Information security | 15% | 400 words | 24 | 回答あり | 2 |
| 3 Mobilisation | 10% | 300 words | 346 | 制限超過 | 1 |
| 4 Social value | 10% | 300 words | 34 | 回答あり | 2 |
| 5 Insurance | Pass/fail | - | 12 | 合否判定 | 1 |
| 6 Exit plan | 5% | 250 words | - | 回答なし | 1 |
エビデンスの不足
- Cyber Essentials Plus expires before the contract startsRenew Cyber Essentials Plus, or state the renewal date in your answer with evidence that it is booked.
- Professional indemnity insurance figure does not match your evidenceCorrect the figure in the answer, or raise the cover and update the evidence file before you submit.
- ISO 27001 is claimed but not in your evidence fileAdd the ISO 27001 certificate (with its expiry date) to your evidence file, or remove the claim if it is not current.
案件の主な日程
- Clarification questions close
- 12 January 2027
- Submission deadline
- 26 January 2027
- Expected contract start
- 1 April 2027
このレビューの作り方
読み取った案件書類: Invitation to tender (fictional) (3ページ)
読み取ったドラフトファイル: Northgate draft response (fictional).docx
- Every scored question, its weighting and its limit, read from the tender
- Each answer matched to its question
- Word and page limits counted
- Each part of multi-part questions looked for
- Certificate, insurance and turnover claims compared with your evidence file
- General assurances without figures or examples
- Social value commitments
2回目の確認: 確認済み8件、引き下げ0件、除外0件。
制約事項
- This review is feedback on your draft. It does not predict or promise a score, a shortlist place or a contract award.
- It reads the tender documents and draft you gave us. Documents we could not read, and any clarifications the buyer has published since, are not covered.
- You remain responsible for the accuracy of your bid and for submitting it through the buyer's own process.
- Quotes from the tender and your draft are shown as written. Our findings are in English.